There is no difference between
traditional trading and spread betting

Spread Bets History

Spread Betting History

1st January 2007

In the late 19th century the American satirist Ambrose Bierce wrote that, “the gambling known as business looks with austere disfavour upon the business known as gambling”. What was true in the 19th century is just as true today. It provides the spread betting industry with perhaps one of its most significant challenges – how to convince the consumer that essentially there is no difference between traditional trading and spread betting. The word gambling is defined by one dictionary as:

  • n 1: money that is risked for possible monetary gain
  • v 1: take a risk in the hope of a favourable outcome.

With the possible exception of those who invest in companies for the sake of the company itself, and leave their money with that company, the definition adequately covers most trading activity.

Understanding that it is not the product that carries inherently more or less risk but the person and mindset using that product would help not only the individual consumer but also the industry, the legislators and the regulators. Such an understanding would, for example, have produced an entirely different ruling by the House of Lords in the Hammersmith & Fulham `swaps’ case of the late 80s. In 1991 the HoL ruled that local authority interest rate swaps were illegal. Their lordships ruled in this way not because the swaps were used as hedging instruments but because they were used illegally in this particular instance. The reality was that it was the performance of the councillors that was at fault and not the financial products or the concept of hedging. Covering risk on behalf of the rates-payers seems an eminently sensible activity. The real issue that led to such a poor ruling by their lordships was that the process smacked of gambling in the traditional usage of word and was, therefore, considered as being overly risky. In fact, the informed professional gambler is the same animal as the fund manager, someone who is paid to be more knowledgeable about investment/betting than the individual placing money with that expert.

Almost any transaction can be adjusted to suit the particular risk characteristics of the individual consumer. And, in fact, products can start with one intention and are utilised for another. Indeed, financial derivatives originally appeared in the early 1970s as a counter to the volatility introduced into the markets by the breakdown of the Bretton Woods system of fixed exchange rates. Another example is the development of credit derivatives that were originally intended to reduce the risk and exposure of organisational finances by building in stability and predictability and consequently insuring against volatility.

However, gamblers immediately recognised that you did not actually need to own a commodity in order to be able to trade its derivatives, you could very simply bet on how the market would move. Thus a product designed to increase stability could be used in a manner that would actually act as a volatility force multiplier. One of the JP Morgan team that originally developed the credit derivative remarked, when asked how she got into the business, “I had read Liar’s Poker and thought that trading derivatives sounded sexy and fun”. That’s gambler-speak.